eyes on the prize

As I’ve written many times, the plight of the adjunct in American colleges and universities is a true nightmare, and a profound stain on the character of those colleges and universities. You could read all about it in more detail and at greater length than I can present here, so it’s enough to say that […]

Continue reading →

minimalism is not the cure

I disagree with Matt Yglesias on many things. (I would say “we disagree on many things,” but I’m sure he doesn’t spend any time thinking about me at all.) I’m also not a fan of his writing as writing, as craft. So I might be expected to be the natural audience for this takedown of […]

Continue reading →

some links for AI skeptics

It’s not unusual for me to feel exasperated by things I read online, but reading this piece on “sentient code” from VentureBeat had me throwing my hands in the air. It’s everything wrong with popular writing about artificial intelligence: filled with hype, vague where specificity is needed most, and generally credulous in a breathless, gee-whiz […]

Continue reading →

finis

As an impossibly perfect coda to my recent argument about the impregnable social fortress of neoliberal brodudes, I leave you with this, a response to that wonderful George Scialabba interview I quoted from the other day.                                

Continue reading →

quote for the day

“My idea of the end of the world would be the hive, the hive mind. Sven Birkerts has a wonderful description of how the horizontal, linked world is gradually evolving in that direction, to where nobody is ever really alone. Nobody is able to just sink deep into his or her own imagination or feelings. […]

Continue reading →